ArticleJHLT open2024
Exercise capacity and cardiac allograft ischemic time in recent heart transplant recipients.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prolonged ischemic times (IT) for transplant hearts transported under cold storage conditions are associated with an increased risk of mortality; however, the impact of IT on functional outcomes, such as exercise capacity (EC), is not fully understood. This prospective, observational cohort study aimed to determine the association between EC, a strong predictor for post-transplant survival, and relatively longer IT. Methods: Thirty heart transplant recipients were grouped dichotomously according to relatively longer (>180 minutes) or shorter (≤180 minutes) IT. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was performed post-transplant upon cardiac rehabilitation admission, during which EC [peak volume of oxygen consumption (VO Results: This cohort was predominantly male ( Conclusions: In this modest-sized cohort, EC was higher in heart transplant recipients with donor IT >180 minutes compared with those with IT ≤180 minutes. However, CPET duration was significantly shorter in those with relatively longer IT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.