ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
Particularities of Variation of the Dental Wear in Subjects with Cardiovascular Diseases Compared to Subjects without Systemic Diseases.
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aim of the studyanalysis of dental wear variation in subjects with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), compared to subjects without systemic diseases (SDs).
methodthe study included 84 hospitalized subjects with CVDs and 84 without SDs subjects, who presented to the Dental Emergency Department of the Emergency Clinical Hospital in Drobeta Turnu Severin. The subjects' data were processed descriptively, by analysis of variance and simple and multiple linear regression.
resultsSubjects with CVDs had a mean age±SD:69.49±10.09, and subjects without SDs had a mean age±SD:58.98±5.61. In subjects with CVDs, out of 504 sextants, 360 (174 maxillary and 186 mandibular) were included in the dental wear assessment, and in subjects without SDs, out of 504 sextants, 480 (242 maxillary and 238 mandibular) were evaluated. The number of remaining teeth (NRT) ranged between 2 and 25 (mean±SD 15.54±5.43) for subjects with CVDs, and between 16 and 27 (mean±SD 22.64±2.47) for subjects without SDs. Analysis of variance of the wear score values assigned to the indicated the highest value F (2, 249) =71.09768707, with F (2, 249)> F crit. (3.032064916) for mandibular sextants in the CVDs subjects. Regression models adjusted independently with gender, age, residence and NRT, revealed a coefficient with values between 11.97%-28.72% for CVDs subjects and between 11.90%-20.88% for subjects without SDs.
conclusiondental wear varied for both categories of subjects in the mandibular arch, compared to the maxillary arch, in their frontal area, compared to the lateral areas, depending on age, residence and NRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.