Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143850›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Characterization of 2D precision and accuracy for combined visual-haptic localization.

Madeline Fischer, Umberto Saetti, Martine Godfroy-Cooper, Douglas Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeline FischerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Umberto SaettiDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Martine Godfroy-CooperAIRBUS, Toulouse, France.
Douglas FischerThe Boeing Company, Ridley Park, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes a combined visual and haptic localization experiment that addresses the area of multimodal cueing. The aim of the present investigation was to characterize two-dimensional (2D) localization precision and accuracy of visual, haptic, and combined visual-tactile targets in the peri-personal space, the space around the body in which sensory information is perceived as ecologically relevant. Participants were presented with visual, haptic, or bimodal cues using the body-centered reference frame and were instructed to indicate the corresponding perceived target location in space using a mouse pointer in an open-loop feedback condition. Outcomes of the unimodal (visual and haptic) and bimodal (combined visual-haptic) localization performance were used to assess the nature of the multisensory combination, using a Bayesian integration model. Results of the study revealed that the visual and haptic perceptive fields are characterized differently in terms of localization performance, providing important considerations for the transformation of each sensory modality when combining cues into a unified percept. The results reaffirmed many well known radial characteristics of vision with respect to localization, and identified a nonlinear pattern of haptic localization performance that was largely influenced by the midline of the center of the torso and each side of the cutaneous region. Overall, the lack of improvement in precision for bimodal cueing relative to the best unimodal cueing modality, vision, is in favor of sensory combination rather than optimal integration predicted by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) model. Conversely, the hypothesis that accuracy in localizing the bimodal visual-haptic targets would represent a compromise between visual and haptic performance in favor of the most precise modality was rejected. Instead, the bimodal accuracy was found to be equivalent to or to exceed that of the best unimodal condition, vision. The results provide some insight into the structure of the underlying sensorimotor processes employed by the brain and confirm the usefulness of capitalizing on naturally occurring differences between vision and haptic to better understand their interaction and their contribution to multimodal perception These results will help inform the development of future human-machine interfaces implementing haptic feedback mechanisms In the context of pilot performance, haptic localization can have several benefits including enhanced situational awareness, improved spatial orientation, reduced workload, thereby contributing to safer operations. These benefits can be applied to future systems for aircraft handling by helping overcome visual illusions and discrepancies between visual and vestibular sensory channels, especially in degraded visual environments.

Indexed as

aviationdegraded visual environmenthaptic cueinglocalizationmulti-modal cueingmultisensory integrationsituational awarenessvisual cueing

Identifiers

PMID40143850
PMCPMC11936952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.