Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143827›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Identifying dysphagia in the intensive care unit: Validation of the Swedish version of the Gugging swallowing screen-Intensive care unit.

Anna Schandl, Liza Bergström, Jenny Selg, Anna Eliasson, Mia Hylèn, Fanny Silfwerbrand, Linda Nymark, Jenny McGreevy, Camilla Brorsson, Thorbjörn Holmlund and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit-Screening requirements.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna SchandlDepartment of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Liza BergströmSpeech and Language Pathology, Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny SelgSpeech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anna EliassonSpeech and Language Pathology, Department of Neurology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mia HylènDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Fanny SilfwerbrandDepartment of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Linda NymarkDepartment of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny McGreevyDepartment of Dietetics, Region Sörmland, Nyköping, Sweden.
Camilla BrorssonAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Thorbjörn HolmlundOtorhinolaryngology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Patricia HägglundSpeech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Aina Brjesson FoundationB-ALF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysphagia is independently associated with adverse outcomes in intensive care units (ICU). Early identification through dysphagia screening does not occur routinely, negatively impacting optimal patient management. This study aimed to validate the Swedish version of the Gugging Swallowing Screen-Intensive Care Unit (GUSS-IVA).

methodsThis is a prospective multicentre study of 56 adult ICU patients with endotracheal intubation exceeding 48 h at three hospitals in Sweden. The GUSS-ICU was translated into Swedish (GUSS-IVA) and used to screen all prolonged intubated patients (>48 h) once extubated. The GUSS-IVA screen was conducted by ICU nursing staff and then compared with a gold standard Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) within 2 h of the GUSS-IVA screen. Fifty-one of 56 patients underwent FEES (where assessors were blinded to the GUSS-IVA screen results). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, as was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For inter-rater reliability, within 2 h of the initial screen, 29/56 patients were GUSS-IVA screened a second time by a nursing staff blinded to the first GUSS-IVA results.

resultsAmong the 56 patients, 38 (67.9%) were identified as dysphagic using the GUSS-IVA screen. With FEES, 42 of 51 patients (82.4%) were diagnosed with dysphagia; of these, 16 (31.4%) were classified as aspirating. Compared to FEES, GUSS-IVA showed high sensitivity and specificity values (81% and 89%, respectively) with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.95) and a positive predictive value of 97%. High convergent validity was obtained for GUSS-IVA compared with the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (ɸ = 0.57, p < .001) and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (ɸ = 0.52, p < .001) and moderate validity with the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (ɸ = 0.30, p = .033). The inter-rater reliability showed moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa κ = 0.501, p = .006).

conclusionsThis study indicates that the Swedish GUSS-IVA is a valid and reliable screen to identify dysphagic ICU patients. Given the negative impact of dysphagia on short and long-term patient outcomes, the Swedish GUSS-IVA is recommended as an essential first step by nursing staff for early identification of dysphagia for further diagnostics and subsequent patient management.

Indexed as

Critical CareDeglutition DisordersIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenaspiration pneumoniacritical carecritical illnessoropharyngeal dysphagia

Identifiers

PMID40143827
PMCPMC11947862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.