ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2025
Metabolic transition from childhood to adulthood based on two decades of biochemical time series in three longitudinal cohorts.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex Differences in Omega-3 and Omega-6 PUFA Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cross-Sectional Comparisons.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Pooled it
- Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Untargeted metabolomics reveals distinct metabolic profiles in MUT-type methylmalonic acidemia.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Impact of Maternal Supplementation of Fish Oil and/or Probiotics During Pregnancy on the Serum Metabolomic Profile From Infancy to Childhood: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis is the first large-scale longitudinal study of children that describes the temporal trajectories of an extensive collection of metabolic measures that are relevant for lifelong cardiometabolic risk. We also provide a comprehensive picture on how metabolism develops into mature adult sex-specific phenotypes.
methodsChildren born in 1962-92 were recruited by three European studies (n = 20 377 eligible). Biochemical data for ages 0-26 years were available for n = 14 958 participants (n = 8385 with metabolomics). Age associations for 168 metabolic measures (6 physiological traits, 6 clinical biomarkers, and 156 serum metabolomics measures) were determined by using curvilinear regression. Puberty effects were calculated by using logistic regression of biological sex for pre- and post-pubertal age strata.
resultsAge-specific concentrations were reported for all measures. Nonlinear age associations were typical, including insulin (R2 = 20.7% ±0.6% variance explained ±SE), glycerol (13.3% ±1.3%), glycoprotein acetyls (40.3% ±1.5%), and branched-chain amino acids (19.5% ±1.6%). Apolipoprotein B was not associated with age (0.7% ±0.4%). Multivariate modeling indicated that boys diverged from girls metabolically during ages 13-17 years. Puberty effects were observed for large high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 8.5 × 10-288), leucine (P < 2.3 × 10-308), glutamine (P < 2.3 × 10-308), albumin (P = 1.7 × 10-161), docosahexaenoic acid (P = 5.2 × 10-50), and sphingomyelin (P = 4.4 × 10-90).
conclusionNovel associations between emerging cardiometabolic risk factors, such as amino acids and glycoprotein acetyls, and growth and puberty were observed. Conversely, apolipoprotein B was stable, which favors its utility for early assessments of lifetime cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.