Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143698›Full record

ArticleCurrent HIV research2026

Fc Functions and Anti-HIV Neutralizing Antibodies: A Perspective.

Hillary A Vanderven, Stephen J Kent

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current HIV research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hillary A VandervenDepartment of Biomedicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences and Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8482-2308
Stephen J KentDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-4891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controversy exists around the relative merits of Fc functions in controlling or preventing HIV-1 infection. Proponents point to general correlations of Fc functions with control of HIV, indicating that non-neutralizing antibodies could force immune escape, as observed in the early experiments with Fc mutants of the b12-neutralizing monoclonal antibody. Nay-sayers point to the primary role of neutralization in the control of HIV, the general failure of vaccine trials including antibodies with Fc functions, and the lack of additional benefit with newer broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, such as PGT121. The truth may lie somewhere in between and there are lessons to be learned from the utility of Fc functions in other viral infections. In general, however, the additional benefit of Fc function over and above robust anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies may be modest. The intense primary research focus on delivering and inducing potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies, regardless of their Fc function potential, is justified.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV AntibodiesImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsFc functionsHIV-1 infectionmonoclonal antibodiesPGT121vaccine trialsviral infections

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.