ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Use of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener in a General Hospital Setting.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Specific differences between interviewer-rated and self-report suicide risk assessments are unknown. This descriptive cross-sectional study examined the acceptance of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) screener, conducted by nurse-interviewers versus self-reporting, and identified the factors contributing to refusal in each mode. We reviewed the charts of inpatients at a general hospital that included the C-SSRS screener at the time of admission. C-SSRS screening by a nurse-interviewer and self-reported mode were included. Two modes and the acceptors and refusers were compared using descriptive statistics. Multi-variate logistic regression was performed to determine associations between the studied factors and suicide risk. The study included 398 patients. The acceptance of the nurse-interview and self-report modes was 93.8% and 74.7%, respectively. Refusers for the former were more likely to be male (p = 0.029) and from the surgical departments (p < 0.001). Refusers for the latter tended to be older (p < 0.001). Compared to the nurse-interview group, the self-report group was more likely to report a high risk of suicide (odds ratio = 6.508, p = 0.041). Each mode of the C-SSRS screener, when used in general hospital inpatients, has its own advantages and disadvantages. Healthcare providers should select the mode optimal for their institutional environment after comprehensively considering the patients' characteristics and available hospital resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.