ArticleMedical physics2025
Accuracy of a helium-beam radiography system based on thin pixel detectors for an anthropomorphic head phantom.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accuracy of a helium-beam radiography system based on thin pixel detectors for an anthropomorphic head phantom.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIon-beam radiography is a promising technique to verify the range of ion-beam radiotherapy treatments regularly. To detect and quantify the water-equivalent thickness (WET) of potential anatomical changes, ion-beam radiographs must provide a sufficient WET accuracy on the level of 1%. PURPOSE: In this work, we show an energy-painted helium-beam radiograph of an anthropomorphic head phantom acquired with thin silicon pixel detectors for the first time. Furthermore, we determine the WET accuracy of our helium-beam radiography system for the especially heterogeneous skull base region, which is highly relevant for the treatment of head and neck and skull base tumors.
methodsWith a detection system based on pixelated semiconducting Timepix detectors, we track single ions upstream and downstream of the head phantom. Furthermore, we measure their energy deposition in a thin Timepix detector behind the anthropomorphic phantom. To ensure a high precision of the image, we acquired a radiograph by using helium beams with five initial energies between 146.84 and 188.07 MeV/u following the energy painting algorithm. With a Siemens SOMATOM Confidence CT scanner, a single- and dual-energy CT were acquired with clinical protocols and translated to relative stopping power (RSP) values. After projecting these scans, the resulting WET maps were compared to the helium-beam radiograph. To evaluate the accuracy of all three modalities, a reference data set based on range-pullback measurements and a segmentation of a high-resolution CT scan was taken into account.
resultsThe mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of all modalities was determined to be between 0.95% and 1.16%. Also, the root-mean-square percentage error (RMSPE) was similar for all modalities ranging from 1.19% to 1.46%. These deviations from the reference scan were found to mainly stem from an overestimation of air and sinus tissue and underestimation of cortical bone.
conclusionsThe helium-beam radiograph was shown to achieve a WET accuracy competitive with that of clinically used imaging methods. If certain technical aspects are addressed, helium-beam radiography may emerge as an auspicious imaging modality for on-couch range verification of ion-beam radiotherapy treatments allowing for regular detection and quantification of anatomical changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.