SynthesisEuropean endodontic journal2025
Accuracy of Ultrasound Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Inflammatory Radicular Cyst and Periapical Granuloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative Characteristics.
Synthesis in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biological mechanisms underlying the inflammatory radicular cyst formation-focus on epithelial proliferation: a systematic review of experimental cell and tissue models.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonic (US) imaging in the differential diagnosis between inflammatory radicular cysts (IRCs) and periapical granulomas (PGs) compared with the histological examination as the reference standard. Scopus, Medline (PubMed), and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 2024. The Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Thirteen cross-sectional studies published between 2003 and 2023 were included in this study. A total sample of 275 patients (one tooth / per patient) comparing ultrasound test vs. histopathological examination was assessed. The summary measures of the US imaging test were: sensitivity= 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99], specificity= 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76-0.88], LR+ = 3.498 [95% CI, 2.079-5.885], LR- = 0.091 [95% CI, 0.050-0.164], DOR = 65.848 (95% CI, 28.857-150.25) and AUC=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00). The methodological assessment was variable in all domains and studies. Approximately 90% and 70% of the studies revealed some form of risk of bias concern in the domains -flow and timing-, and -reference standard-, respectively. US imaging can be regarded as a highly accurate and consistent method for IRC vs. PG differential diagnosis. The echotexture features of periapical lesions in US images reflected their histopathological characteristics. (EEJ-2024-09-150).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.