ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2025
The Effect of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound on Intracanal Bacterial Reduction, Chemical Structure, and Mechanical Properties of Root Dentine.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHigh-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has demonstrated significant efficacy in eradicating bacteria from substrates emerging as a promising solution for root canal disinfection. This in-vitro study investigated the effects of HIFU on reducing intracanal bacteria and its impact on the chemical and mechanical properties of root dentine. It also aimed to demonstrate acoustic wave penetration and distribution within the root canal system (RCS) and characterize the associated temperature changes.
methodsEighty-two extracted premolar teeth with single canals, infected with Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and cultured for two weeks, were randomly assigned to four groups: negative control, 4% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 60 s HIFU, and 120 s HIFU (operated at 250 kHz/20W). Post-treatment, biofilm samples were collected from the root canals to assess viable bacterial cells using colony-forming unit (CFU) and 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays. The root canal surfaces were subsequently examined using scanning electron microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), microhardness, and Raman spectroscopy. Acoustic wave penetration, distribution, and temperature changes within the RCS were examined using CLSM and thermal camera.
resultsHIFU at 60 s and 120 s consistently demonstrated superior anti-bacterial efficacy against E. faecalis biofilms compared to 4% NaOCl. MTT and CFU assays revealed a significant reduction in biofilm viability, particularly at 120 s of HIFU exposure (p<0.05). CLSM and SEM analyses demonstrated enhanced penetration and detachment of biofilms, as well as improved smear layer removal and preservation of dentinal tubules, especially at 120 s of HIFU exposure. HIFU treatment did not adversely affect the amide/mineral content of root dentine or its surface microhardness. Additionally, HIFU enhanced acoustic wave propagation and resulted in a controlled increase in temperature within the root canal over time.
conclusionThis minimally invasive approach shows promise for removing bacterial biofilms in the RCS, positioning HIFU as a valuable adjunctive treatment for enhancing root canal disinfection. (EEJ-2024-08-123).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.