ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2025
Cyclic Fatigue, Torsional Strength and Angular Deflection of Different Reciprocating Instruments: A Critical Analysis of Its Clinical Relevance.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Canal Transportation, Centring Ability, Shaping Volume and Debris Extrusion in Double-Curved Root Canals Prepared with Four Reciprocating Systems: An in vitro study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Cyclic Fatigue Resistance, Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Elemental Analysis of Three Reciprocating Systems.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Exploring the potential of reciprocating systems in modern endodontics.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the cyclic fatigue fracture resistance, torsional fatigue, and angular deflection of Reciproc Blue (RB), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), and Plex RC-One (RC-One) instruments for managing root curvatures in simulated canals.
methodsA sample size calculation determined 10 samples per group (5 instruments for the cyclic fatigue test and 5 for the torsional fatigue test) for detecting significant differences. The study included 40 NiTi instruments (25 mm) from four reciprocating systems groups: RB R25, WOG 25, OR 25, and RC-One 25. Instruments were inspected for defects. Bending tests assessed memory control. Static cyclic fatigue tests used an artificial 60° curved canal with motorized activation. Torsional fatigue followed ISO 3630-1, measuring torque and angular deflection until failure. Fractured surfaces were analyzed using automated image analysis and measured with Rhinoceros 8.0 software. Statistical analysis included central tendency and dispersion measures, followed by ANOVA to identify statistically significant differences between groups.
resultsThe bending test showed RC-One retained shape after pressure, while RB exhibited moderate resistance. WOG and OR did not demonstrate satisfactory bending resistance. Analysis of cyclic fatigue revealed RC-One had the highest resistance, followed by RB, OR, and WOG (p<0.001). RB required the highest torque for fracture, followed by RC-One, WOG, and OR (p<0.001). WOG had the lowest deflection angle at fracture, followed by OR, RB, and RC-One (p=0.0399). SEM and intelligent automated image processing analysis showed RC-One and RB had wear zones indicative of slow fracture, while WOG and OR displayed 100% rapid fracture dimples. RC-One had 41.86% slow fracture and 54.14% rapid fracture, while RB had 17.83% slow and 82.17% rapid fracture. Torsion tests revealed similar features in RC-One and RB, supporting their high and similar torsional resistance and deflection, unlike WOG's lower resistance and OR's lowest resistance with the highest deflection.
conclusionThe best performance in the bending test was obtained by RC-One, followed by RB, while most failures were observed in WOG and OR. RC-One showed significantly higher cyclic fatigue resistance in severe curvatures than RB, WOG, and OR. RB and RC-One exhibited very similar torsional resistance values, significantly higher than OR and WOG. RC-One displayed superior angular deflection results compared to the other instruments. (EEJ-2024-08-135).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.