ReviewCytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology2025
WHO Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology: Insights Into the Insufficient/Inadequate/Non-Diagnostic, Atypical and Suspicious for Malignancy Categories and How to Use Them.
Review in Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic concordance of remote WSI-based thyroid cytology compared to conventional cytological diagnosis: a pilot study.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHO System) is an international effort aiming to serve patients worldwide in all medical resource settings and improve patient care globally. It is an evidence-based standardised reporting system applicable to all respiratory cytopathology specimens. The WHO System consists of five diagnostic categories including Insufficient/Inadequate/Non-diagnostic, Benign, Atypical, Suspicious for malignancy and Malignant. Each category has an associated risk of malignancy established from the current literature and recommendations for further management to establish as precise a diagnosis as possible. The key diagnostic cytopathological criteria for each entity are established, a differential diagnosis based on cytopathological features that is globally applicable is discussed, and best practices in appropriate ancillary studies are presented. The Insufficient/Inadequate/Non-diagnostic, Atypical and Suspicious for malignancy are diagnostic categories that are particularly challenging for cytopathologists and clinicians and patients due to the organ's diversity in sampling methods, cell types and the wide variety of neoplasms. Herein, we have reviewed the role of these three categories, discussed their definitions and cytopathological criteria, appropriate applications, risk of malignancy, clinical recommendations for patient's further diagnostic workup and application of ancillary studies. The aim was to increase cytopathologists and clinicians understanding of the three categories and provide a framework for the essential discussions that should follow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.