Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143515›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Critical Thinking and Mental Health Nurse Education.

Jane Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jane FisherSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8422-1315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines critical thinking as a fundamental proficiency essential for inclusion in international mental health nurse education. Pragmatic solutions ensure the ongoing development of critical thinking in mental health nurses. The suitability of current mental health nurse education is under scrutiny globally. Critics claim that regulatory and educational standards have shifted from a focus on mental health-specific skills to generic physical health-based competencies, which do not adequately equip mental health nurses for clinical practice. The vital skill of critical thinking within mental health nurse theory and practice has been diluted (stating that it is a position paper or critical review, for example). This paper is a critical review of mental health nursing education. By summarising the global contextual background of generic-based nursing education, it highlights the impact of the loss of mental health-specific skill sets. Critical thinking is identified as a vital skill for the 21st-century mental health nurse. This paper provides pragmatic suggestions to include critical thinking in nurse education in the absence of global reform and systemic educational change. Personal lived experience is used to illustrate the importance of critical thinking and service users' experience of care. Critical thinking can be a partial solution to the current dilution of mental health nurse education occurring across the global North. Nurse educators should strive to embed critical thinking into mental health nurse education in order to develop lifelong critical thinkers who are not afraid to question the hegemonic perspective and continually ask, "why?" Recommendations are for nurse educators to be consciously aware of methods to encourage critical thinking, such as Socratic questioning, the consideration of epistemic injustice, coproduction, critical reflexivity and including case-based ethical learning.

Indexed as

Education, NursingPsychiatric NursingThinkingClinical CompetenceHumanscriticalitycritical thinkinggenericismmental health nurse educationmental health nursing

Identifiers

PMID40143515
PMCPMC11947509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.