Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143430›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2025

Increasing Methodological Transparency and Openness in Rehabilitation-Related Health Services Research Using Claims Data: A Case Example.

Janet K Freburger, Elizabeth R Mormer, Kristin Ressel, Anna M Johnson, Amy M Pastva, Cheryl D Bushnell, Pamela W Duncan, Sara B Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janet K FreburgerDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, United States.
Elizabeth R MormerDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, United States.
Kristin ResselDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-3130, United States.
Anna M JohnsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, United States.
Amy M PastvaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, United States.
Cheryl D BushnellDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States.
Pamela W DuncanDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States.
Sara B JonesDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27516, United States.

Funding

NIH HHS 1R01HD101493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health insurance claims are a rich source of information for health services researchers and can provide evidence to understand issues related to access, efficiency, and effectiveness of care. While numerous studies have examined rehabilitation utilization using Medicare, Medicaid, and/or private insurance claims data, these studies typically lack detail on approaches used to identify rehabilitation services. The primary objectives of this perspective are: (1) to raise awareness of the need for and importance of methodological transparency and openness in rehabilitation-related health services research using claims data and (2) to provide a case example by sharing the details of a method for identifying community-based physical therapy and occupational therapy in Medicare claims. General decisions made in claims-based analyses are discussed and then illustrated with the approach used for identifying community-based therapy claims within the context of a secondary analysis of data from a large, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial. Specific decisions made and challenges encountered are discussed, and recommendations are made for future work in this area. Sharing methodological details, data when possible, and metadata on approaches for conducting rehabilitation-related health services research can enhance its validity, rigor, and-ultimately-overall value. Rehabilitation health services researchers are encouraged to make greater efforts to share information on their methodological approaches using claims data and other data relevant to health services research.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchInsurance Claim ReviewOccupational TherapyRehabilitation ResearchHumansMedicareUnited StatesAdministrative ClaimsCohort StudiesHealth CareHealth Services ResearchResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID40143430
PMCPMC12491995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.