ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Cesarean Delivery in Fetal Triploidy: Clinical Considerations and Case Study Insights.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fetal triploidy is a rare, lethal disorder characterized by an extra set of haploid chromosomes resulting in 69 chromosomes (69, XXX; 69, XXY; or 69, XYY). Fetal anomalies and occasionally maternal complications such as hypertension result in a high fetal loss rate during gestation. It is estimated to be present in 1: 250 000 pregnancies at 20 weeks, and very few survive to term. Diagnosis is suspected by antepartum ultrasound and confirmed by invasive testing of fetal cells by karyotype. Management includes pregnancy termination or pregnancy continuation based on the patient's choice. Whether a cesarean delivery should be performed for a nonmaternal indication in a triploid pregnancy is controversial. CASE REPORT A 17-year-old primagravida presented at 33 weeks post-last menstrual period with several weeks of lower abdominal pain and nausea. She had received prenatal care at an outside facility and had a second-trimester ultrasound. She declined amniocentesis for definitive fetal karyotyping. On arrival at our hospital, an ultrasound revealed multiple fetal anatomic anomalies. She developed nonreassuring fetal surveillance and underwent cesarean delivery at 37 weeks. The infant died on day 20 of life. CONCLUSIONS Triploidy is a condition that results in ultrasound-detectable anomalies early in the first half of pregnancy. Noninvasive prenatal screens are unreliable for definitive triploid detection. Confirmation of a fetal chromosomal disorder requires an invasive test such as an amniocentesis. Knowing that the fetus has a lethal disorder allows 2 important options: first, a pregnancy termination; second, declining a cesarean delivery. This case illustrates that refusing the amniocentesis changes the entire course of the pregnancy management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.