Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143423›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025

Cesarean Delivery in Fetal Triploidy: Clinical Considerations and Case Study Insights.

Allison Bautista, Teresa Bernardes, Christine C Greves, Michael Stroup, Stephen J Carlan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison BautistaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
Teresa BernardesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
Christine C GrevesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
Michael StroupDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
Stephen J CarlanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-8538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Fetal triploidy is a rare, lethal disorder characterized by an extra set of haploid chromosomes resulting in 69 chromosomes (69, XXX; 69, XXY; or 69, XYY). Fetal anomalies and occasionally maternal complications such as hypertension result in a high fetal loss rate during gestation. It is estimated to be present in 1: 250 000 pregnancies at 20 weeks, and very few survive to term. Diagnosis is suspected by antepartum ultrasound and confirmed by invasive testing of fetal cells by karyotype. Management includes pregnancy termination or pregnancy continuation based on the patient's choice. Whether a cesarean delivery should be performed for a nonmaternal indication in a triploid pregnancy is controversial. CASE REPORT A 17-year-old primagravida presented at 33 weeks post-last menstrual period with several weeks of lower abdominal pain and nausea. She had received prenatal care at an outside facility and had a second-trimester ultrasound. She declined amniocentesis for definitive fetal karyotyping. On arrival at our hospital, an ultrasound revealed multiple fetal anatomic anomalies. She developed nonreassuring fetal surveillance and underwent cesarean delivery at 37 weeks. The infant died on day 20 of life. CONCLUSIONS Triploidy is a condition that results in ultrasound-detectable anomalies early in the first half of pregnancy. Noninvasive prenatal screens are unreliable for definitive triploid detection. Confirmation of a fetal chromosomal disorder requires an invasive test such as an amniocentesis. Knowing that the fetus has a lethal disorder allows 2 important options: first, a pregnancy termination; second, declining a cesarean delivery. This case illustrates that refusing the amniocentesis changes the entire course of the pregnancy management.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionTriploidyAdolescentFatal OutcomeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID40143423
PMCPMC11957313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.