ArticleViruses2025
Liver Scores in the Prognostication of COVID-19 Patients.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Elevated non-invasive liver fibrosis scores at admission are independent risk factors for severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study from 2020 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of easily accessible prognostic biomarkers for patients with COVID-19 remains an important area of clinical research. In this large monocentric study at a German tertiary care hospital, we determined the prognostic performance of different liver scores in 605 patients with COVID-19. We evaluated the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, the Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and the De Ritis ratio (DRR; AST/ALT ratio). The 30-day mortality was used as primary COVID-19 outcome measure. The need for intensive care unit (ICU) treatment and overall mortality were secondary endpoints. Univariable analyses showed that most of the investigated liver-related scores (FIB-4, MELD, and DRR), but not APRI for overall mortality, were significantly associated with key outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Concurrently, well-known risk factors-such as advanced age, diabetes, and cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities-were also linked to worse outcomes, except for the female sex having a preventive effect against ICU admission. A history of liver disease was rarely documented among the patients and showed no significant impact on the examined endpoints. Multivariable analyses further revealed that advanced age, DRR, and MELD were independent predictors of both 30-day and overall mortality, while FIB-4 emerged as an independent predictor specifically for overall mortality. Regarding ICU admission, obesity, underlying lung disease, and elevated APRI and MELD scores were identified as independent risk factors, whereas the female sex appeared to be protective. Overall, MELD demonstrated the strongest prognostic value for mortality and ICU admission, with DRR also exhibiting independent predictive power for mortality. These findings suggest that scores originally developed for chronic liver disease assessment-namely FIB-4, APRI, MELD, and DRR-hold promise as prognostic tools in COVID-19. In particular, MELD and DRR emerged as the most powerful biomarkers for predicting severe disease and mortality, highlighting the potential for incorporating these indices into risk stratification models for COVID-19 management. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.