ArticleViruses2025
Computational Approaches to Predict Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Protein Mutations That Confer Resistance to Capsid Assembly Modulators.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capsid assembly modulators (CAMs) are a novel class of antiviral agents in clinical development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. CAMs inhibit hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication by binding to a hydrophobic pocket, i.e., HAP pocket, between HBV capsid protein (Cp) dimer-dimer interfaces to misdirect its assembly into empty capsids or aberrant structures and designated as CAM-E and CAM-A, respectively. Because the emergence of CAM-resistant variants results in the failure of antiviral therapy, it is important to rationally design CAMs with a high barrier of resistance for development. To establish computational approaches for the prediction of Cp mutations that confer resistance to CAMs, we investigated the interaction of representative CAM-A and CAM-E compounds, BAY 41-4109 and JNJ-56136379, with wild-type and 35 naturally occurring mutations of Cp residues at the HAP pocket using molecular docking, prime molecular mechanics with generalized Born and surface area solvation (MM/GBSA) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation methods. Out of nine publicly available HBV capsid or CpY132A hexamer structures in the protein database, molecular docking correctly predicted the resistance and sensitivity of more than 50% Cp mutations to JNJ-56136379 with structures 5D7Y and 5T2P-FA. MM/GBSA correctly predicted the resistance and sensitivity of more than 50% Cp mutations to BAY41-4109 with the structures 5E0I-BC and 5WRE-FA, and to JNJ-56136379 with the 5E0I-FA structure. Our work indicates that only the capsid or CpY132A hexamer structure bound with a CAM with similar chemical scaffold can be used for more accurately predicting the resistance and sensitivity of Cp mutations to a CAM molecule under investigation by molecular docking and/or MM/GBSA methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.