ArticleViruses2025
A Retrospective Sero-Surveillance Study for Antibodies Against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Norway.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microorganisms inInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
- Underrecognized Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Serbia: Evidence from Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Neuroinvasive Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antibodies against tick-borne pathogens in domestic dogs in Norway: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, tick-borne encephalitis virus, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is an emerging pathogen that initially causes flu-like symptoms and can progress to central nervous system (CNS) infections. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an endemic disease in southern coastal counties with regular human cases, while the causative agent, TBEV, is prevalent in ticks in most of the coastal regions of Norway. This study was aimed to understand TBEV infection status across Norway including both TBE endemic and non-endemic areas. For this, we analyzed a total of 1940 residual serum samples from 19 counties of Norway (as of 2016). The samples were initially screened by ELISA, followed by virus neutralization tests for TBEV confirmation. We found a similar TBEV seroprevalence of 1.7% in TBE endemic and 1.6% in non-endemic areas. Since TBE cases are only reported from endemic regions, our findings suggest a potential subclinical or asymptomatic infection and underdiagnosis in non-endemic areas. Notably, only 43% of the ELISA-positive samples were confirmed by virus neutralization tests indicating that not all ELISA positives are true TBEV infections. Additionally, 137 samples of patients presenting with symptoms of CNS infections from a non-endemic area were included. Of these samples, 11 ELISA-positive samples were analyzed for cross-reactivity among flaviviruses. Cross-reactivity was detected with Dengue virus, West Nile Virus, and non-specific reactions. This underscores the importance of using multiple diagnostic tests to confirm TBEV infections. None of the patients with CNS infection was found to be TBE positive, and in the whole cohort, we found a low TBEV seroprevalence of 0.7%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.