Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143127›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Exploiting the Anticancer, Antimicrobial and Antiviral Potential of Naphthoquinone Derivatives: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.

Shouyan Xiang, Yubei Li, Shah Nawaz Khan, Weixin Zhang, Gaoyang Yuan, Jiahua Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Trypanocidal Activity of Dual Redox-Active Quinones:Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shouyan XiangSchool of Pharmacy, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-5112
Yubei LiSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Shah Nawaz KhanSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3052-3510
Weixin ZhangSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Gaoyang YuanSchool of Pharmacy, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China.
Jiahua CuiSchool of Pharmacy, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7164-6851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a primary cause of mortality, with over 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths globally in 2018. Chemotherapy, which utilizes a spectrum of cytotoxic drugs targeting the rapidly dividing cancer cells, is a predominant treatment modality. However, the tendency of chemotherapeutics to induce drug resistance and exhibit non-specific cytotoxicity necessitates the development of new anticancer agents with heightened efficacy and minimized toxicity. In recent years, the discovery of safe and effective antibacterial/antiviral agents has also been a hot spot in medicinal chemistry. This paper comprehensively reviews the synthesis, anticancer/antibacterial/antiviral activity, and structure-activity relationships of natural 1,4-naphthoquinones and their derivatives. It highlights their potential as efficient and low-toxicity antitumor and anti-infectious drug candidates.

Indexed as

1,4-naphthoquinonesanticancerantimicrobialantiviralnatural productsstructure–activity relationships

Identifiers

PMID40143127
PMCPMC11944738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.