ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Unusual-Site Venous Thrombosis: An Update.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as the preferred oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and pulmonary embolism. DOACs offer several advantages over vitamin K antagonists, including fixed dosage, fewer drug interactions, faster onset of action, and a lower risk of major bleeding, especially intracranial. Although evidence on the use of DOACs in unusual-site venous thrombosis (USVT) is limited, their use in such cases is becoming increasingly common. This narrative review examines the evidence derived from randomized controlled trials, and large observational studies focused on the use of the DOACs in USVT, including cerebral, splanchnic, upper extremity, ovarian, renal, and retinal vein thrombosis. In addition, it also provides practical advice for their use in these clinical settings according to the updated scientific literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.