Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143001›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Advancements in Nanoemulsion-Based Drug Delivery Across Different Administration Routes.

Maria D Chatzidaki, Evgenia Mitsou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of intranasal vitamin A nanoparticles on persistent olfactory dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria D ChatzidakiInstitute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 11635 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-9547
Evgenia MitsouInstitute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 11635 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-2446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoemulsions (NEs) have emerged as effective drug delivery systems over the past few decades due to their multifaceted nature, offering advantages such as enhanced bioavailability, protection of encapsulated compounds, and low toxicity. In the present review, we focus on advancements in drug delivery over the last five years across (trans)dermal, oral, ocular, nasal, and intra-articular administration routes using NEs. Rational selection of components, surface functionalization, incorporation of permeation enhancers, and functionalization with targeting moieties are explored for each route discussed. Additionally, apart from NEs, we explore NE-based drug delivery systems (e.g., NE-based gels) while highlighting emerging approaches such as vaccination and theranostic applications. The growing interest in NEs for drug delivery purposes is reflected in clinical trials, which are also discussed. By summarizing the latest advances, exploring new strategies, and identifying critical challenges, this review focuses on developments for efficient NE-based therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

drug deliveryintra-articularnanoemulsionsnasalocularoral(trans)dermal

Identifiers

PMID40143001
PMCPMC11945362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.