Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40142902›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Novel Advances, Emerging Techniques, and Recent Clinical Trials.

Ilana S Golub, Abhinav Thummala, Tyler Morad, Jasmeet Dhaliwal, Francisco Elisarraras, Ronald P Karlsberg, Geoffrey W Cho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilana S GolubDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1066-9002
Abhinav ThummalaDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-6623
Tyler MoradDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-9306-2511
Jasmeet DhaliwalDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5039-594X
Francisco ElisarrarasDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ronald P KarlsbergDavid Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4695-9092
Geoffrey W ChoDavid Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4438-2093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death, accounting for over 30% of annual global fatalities. Ischemic heart disease, in turn, is a frontrunner of worldwide CVD mortality. With the burden of coronary disease rapidly growing, understanding the nuances of cardiac imaging and risk prognostication becomes paramount. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a frequently utilized and well established testing modality due to its significant clinical impact in disease diagnosis and risk assessment. Recently, nuclear cardiology has witnessed major advancements, driven by innovations in novel imaging technologies and improved understanding of cardiovascular pathophysiology. Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to MPI have enhanced diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). AI techniques such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) neural networks offer new interpretations of immense data fields, acquired through cardiovascular imaging modalities such as nuclear medicine (NM). Recently, AI algorithms have been employed to enhance image reconstruction, reduce noise, and assist in the interpretation of complex datasets. The rise of AI in nuclear medicine (AI-NM) has proven itself groundbreaking in the efficiency of image acquisition, post-processing time, diagnostic ability, consistency, and even in risk-stratification and outcome prognostication. To that end, this narrative review will explore these latest advances in AI in nuclear medicine and its rapid transformation of the cardiac diagnostics landscape. This paper will examine the evolution of AI-NM, review novel AI techniques and applications in nuclear cardiac imaging, summarize recent AI-NM clinical trials, and explore the technical and clinical challenges in its implementation of artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)cardiovascular disease (CVD)computed tomography (CT)convolutional neural networks (CNNs)coronary flow reserve (CFR)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)nuclear medicine (NM)positron emission tomography (PET)recurrent neural networks (RNNs)single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)support vector machines (SVMs)

Identifiers

PMID40142902
PMCPMC11943256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.