Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40142870›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Thoracic Ultrasound for Pre-Procedural Dynamic Assessment of Non-Expandable Lung: A Non-Invasive, Real-Time and Multifaceted Diagnostic Tool.

Guido Marchi, Federico Cucchiara, Alessio Gregori, Giulia Biondi, Giacomo Guglielmi, Massimiliano Serradori, Marco Gherardi, Luciano Gabbrielli, Francesco Pistelli, Laura Carrozzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guido MarchiPulmonology Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-6122-7792
Federico CucchiaraDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Alessio GregoriDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Giulia BiondiDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Giacomo GuglielmiDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Massimiliano SerradoriPulmonology Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Marco GherardiPulmonology Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Luciano GabbrielliPulmonology Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Francesco PistelliDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5612-6364
Laura CarrozziDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-expandable lung (NEL) occurs when the lung fails to fully re-expand after pleural fluid drainage, complicating management and limiting therapeutic options. Diagnosis, based on clinical symptoms, pleural manometry, and traditional imaging, is often delayed to the peri- or post-procedural stages, leading to improper management, complications, and higher healthcare costs. Therefore, early, pre-procedural diagnostic methods are needed. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has emerged as a non-invasive tool with the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and guide clinical decisions, yet, it remains inadequately studied within the context of NEL. We conducted a non-systematic narrative review using a structured methodology, including a comprehensive database search, predefined inclusion criteria, and QUADAS-2 quality assessment. This approach ensured a rigorous synthesis of evidence on TUS in NEL, with the aim of identifying knowledge gaps and guiding future studies. Non-invasive, real-time, bedside M-mode TUS has demonstrated efficacy in predicting NEL prior to thoracentesis by detecting an absent sinusoidal sign and reduced atelectatic lung movement. Emerging experimental techniques, including 2D shear wave elastography (SWE), speckle tracking imaging (STI) strain analysis, the lung/liver echogenicity (LLE) ratio, TUS assessment of dynamic air bronchograms, and pleural thickening evaluation, show additional potential to enhance pre-procedural NEL detection. However, all these methods have significant limitations that require further comprehensive investigation. Despite their significant promise, TUS modalities for early NEL detection still require rigorous validation and standardization before broad clinical use. A multimodal diagnostic approach, combining clinical manifestations, pleural manometry, radiologic and ultrasonographic findings, along with emerging techniques (once fully validated), may provide the most extensive framework for NEL. Regardless of advancements, patient-centered care and shared decision-making remain essential. Further research is needed to improve outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance long-term treatment strategies.

Indexed as

diagnosisindwelling pleural catheter (IPC)lung entrapmentmalignant pleural effusion (MPE)non-expandable lung (NEL)pleural effusion (PE)pleural manometrythoracentesisthoracic ultrasound (TUS)trapped lung

Identifiers

PMID40142870
PMCPMC11943427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.