ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of leadless versus transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing: a propensity-weighted real-world study in France.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical translation and engineering challenges of soft robotic cardiac sleeves for heart failure.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Left arm twitching caused by failure of pacemaker lead insulation.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Evolutions in Cardiovascular Implants-A Review of Past, Present, and Future.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Acute Cardiac Tamponade Caused by Right Ventricular Perforation After Temporary Transvenous Pacing.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Perioperative management of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a state of the art narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- The cardiac conduction system: development, function and therapeutic targets.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- A review of the extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system: technology, development, clinical outcomes, and global experience.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are commonly used for a number of cardiac-related conditions, and it is estimated that over 300,000 CIEDs are placed annually in the US. With advances in technology surrounding these devices and expanding indications, CIEDs can remain implanted in patients for long periods of time. Although the safety profile of these devices has improved over time, both the incidence and prevalence of long-term complications are expected to increase. This review highlights pertinent long-term complications of CIEDs, including lead-related issues, device-related arrhythmias, inappropriate device therapies, and device-related infections. We also explore key clinical aspects of each complication, including common presentations, patient-specific and non-modifiable risk factors, diagnostic evaluation, and recommended management strategies. Our goal is to help spread awareness of CIED-related complications and to empower physicians to manage them effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.