ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Mapping the Epileptogenic Brain Using Low-Frequency Stimulation: Two Decades of Advances and Uncertainties.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional excitability, not epileptic pathology, drives stimulation-evoked interictal spike increases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Intrinsic and extrinsic connectivity of the seizure onset zone at rest and during stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The Physics and Physiology of Electrical Stimulation of the Brain.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cortical stimulation is the process of delivering brief pulses of electrical current and visualizing the distributed pattern of evoked responses across the brain. Compared to high-frequency stimulation, which has long been used for seizure provocation and functional mapping, low-frequency stimulation (<1-2 Hz) is rarely incorporated into the epilepsy surgery evaluation. Increasingly, researchers have demonstrated that various cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) features, including early and delayed responses, evoked high-frequency oscillations, and derived network metrics, may be useful biomarkers of tissue excitability and abnormal connectivity. Emerging evidence also highlights a potential role of CCEPs in guiding neuromodulatory therapies like responsive neurostimulation. In this review, we examine the past two decades of innovation in low-frequency stimulation as it pertains to pre-surgical evaluation. We begin with a basic overview of single-pulse electrical stimulation and CCEPs, including definitions, methodology, physiology, and traditional interpretation. We then explore the literature examining CCEPs as markers of cortical excitability, seizure onset, and network-level dysfunction. Finally, the relationship between stimulation-induced and spontaneous seizures is considered. By examining these questions, we identify both opportunities and pitfalls along the path towards integrating low-frequency stimulation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.