Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40142717›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

From Diversion to Permanence: Trends in Ostomy Creation in Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Alice Jo, Matthew Z Wilson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07369219 (The Impact of AI-Powered Video-Based Discharge Education and Follow-up Intervention on Patient Outcomes and Home Care Management in Colorectal Surgery Patients Receiving Care in Line With the Postoperative Accelerated Recovery Protocol), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07369219 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of AI-Powered Video-Based Discharge Education and Follow-up Intervention on Patient Outcomes and Home Care Management in Colorectal Surgery Patients Receiving Care in Line With the Postoperative Accelerated Recovery Protocol: A Mixed Methods Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBahçeşehir UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsHome Care, Enhanced Recovery, Colo-rectal Cancer, Colorectal SurgeryArmsEducational intervention, Standard maintenance therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alice JoDepartment of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
Matthew Z WilsonDepartment of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-4797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal cancer surgery has undergone transformative advancements over the past few decades, evolving from radical, high-morbidity procedures to more refined techniques focused on both oncological outcomes and the preservation of anorectal function. This review provides a brief overview of the history of rectal cancer surgery, highlighting key innovations in imaging, neoadjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive techniques that have significantly reduced the need for permanent and temporary ostomies. Additionally, the current indications for both permanent and temporary ostomies are reviewed, including a discussion of associated complications, such as non-reversal, parastomal hernias, stomal prolapse, stenosis, and skin-related issues, along with strategies and techniques to mitigate these complications. This review underscores the importance of ongoing innovation and individualized surgical planning to enhance patient outcomes in rectal cancer care by understanding the historical context, contemporary practices, and associated challenges.

Indexed as

diverting ostomyostomy complicationspermanent ostomyrectal cancer surgerysphincter preservationtemporary ostomy

Identifiers

PMID40142717
PMCPMC11943012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.