Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40142431›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Microbiome and Microbiota Within Wineries: A Review.

Cristina Aires, Rita Maioto, António Inês, Albino Alves Dias, Paula Rodrigues, Conceição Egas, Ana Sampaio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina AiresCentro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Rita MaiotoCentro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
António InêsCentro de Química Vila Real (CQ-VR), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1335-4214
Albino Alves DiasCentro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-7991
Paula RodriguesCentro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), SusTEC, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3789-2730
Conceição EgasGenoinseq-Next Generation Sequencing Unit, Biocant, BiocantPark, Núcleo 04, Lote 8, 3060-197 Cantanhede, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2307-5414
Ana SampaioCentro de Investigação e Tecnologias Agroambientais e Biológicas (CITAB), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7989-0779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of this work is to review the winery's microbiota, from the grape to the winery's microbial niches (fermentation tanks, surfaces, air), and their risks to wine and human health. The impact of climate change on the winery microbiome and related challenges are also discussed. Microbial diversity in wineries depends on several factors, such as the grape variety and its ripeness, temperature, relative humidity and the diverse activities of the winemaking process. Winery surfaces and equipment allow the establishment of a microbial community that can impact wine quality, the health of winery workers and visitors and even wine consumers. In the context of climate change, changes in the sugar content, phenolic compounds and the profile of hexoses and amino acids are already evident. These changes interfere with the fermentation microbiota and the quality of the wines, which are more alcoholic and less acidic. Furthermore, periods of drought or heavy rain favor species associated with berry diseases, including some capable of producing mycotoxins or harmful biogenic amines. In order to understand the impact of these changes on microbial communities, the use of various techniques will be discussed, such as flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and metagenomic methods.

Indexed as

bacteriaclimate changefungiriskssurfacesvinificationyeast

Identifiers

PMID40142431
PMCPMC11944700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.