ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Nasal Microbiota Profiling as a Predictive Secondary Tool for COVID-19 Diagnosis: The Critical Role of Taxonomic Resolution.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal multi-omic dynamics in hospitalized COVID-19 patients based on disease severity.Gut microbes reports · 2026Article
- Identifying microbial biomarkers of neurodegeneration: a comparative study in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to an urgent need for effective and rapid diagnostic tools. In the present study, we have evaluated the predictive diagnostic potential of nasal microbiota by analyzing microbial community structures at different taxonomic level resolutions-species, genus, family, order, class and phylum-using Random Forest modelling. A total of 179 nasal swabs from COVID-19-positive (n = 85) and COVID-19-negative (n = 94) individuals were sequenced using a full-length 16S rRNA sequencing (Oxford Nanopore) approach. During each iteration of the Random Forest model, the dataset was randomly split into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%). Model performance improved with finer taxonomic resolution, achieving the highest accuracy at the Species level (AUROC = 0.821 ± 0.059) and a sensitivity of 55.6% at a specificity threshold of 90%. A progressive decline in AUROC and sensitivity was observed at broader taxonomic levels. Furthermore, Beta diversity analysis supported that microbial community structures are more distinct between COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups at finer taxonomic levels. These findings highlight the potential role of nasal microbiota profiling as a secondary diagnostic tool for COVID-19, particularly at species- and genus-level classification, and underscore the importance of high taxonomic resolution in microbiome-based diagnostics. However, limited by an uneven sample distribution and the lack of medical evaluations, further large-scale studies are needed before the nasal microbiota can be implemented in the clinical diagnostics of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.