ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
A Narrative Review of RAS Mutations in Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- LNA GapmeR silencing of KRAS G12V impairs growth and function in SW480 cells.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Malignancies Prior to Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Colorectal cancer liver metastases: mechanism and therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Molecular Profiling of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in Colorectal Cancer: Insights From a Libyan Cohort.Cureus · 2025Article
- RAS Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Novel Therapeutic Approaches.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The Role of Circular RNA in the Progression of Gliomas and Its Potential Clinical Applications.Biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most common cancer globally and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. While the prognostic and predictive roles of RAS mutations in advanced CRC are well-established, their significance in early-stage CRC remains a topic of debate. Studies have been conducted for many years on clinical and pathological parameters that may be associated with RAS mutation, and there are inconsistent results in this regard. Currently, the only biomarker used in early-stage CRC is microsatellite status. KRAS mutations are detected in 40-50% of patients with colorectal cancer. RAS activating mutations cause loss of EGFR regulation by acting on the RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling pathways. In advanced colorectal cancer, these mechanisms cause a decrease in the effectiveness of EGFR inhibitors. However, studies on patients with early-stage colorectal cancer have inconsistent results. This review highlights the prognostic and clinical significance of KRAS mutations in early-stage CRC, particularly in MSS tumors. In the MSS group, KRAS mutations were associated with shorter TTR and OS compared to DWT patients. In contrast, in the MSI-H group, KRAS mutations showed no prognostic effect in TTR and OS. However. KRAS mutations were associated with shorter SAR in both MSI-H and MSS groups of patients. The findings underscore the need for routine molecular profiling, including KRAS and MSI status, to refine risk stratification and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Further studies are warranted to explore targeted therapeutic approaches for KRAS-mutant CRC in the adjuvant setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.