ArticleMicromachines2025
6DOF Aircraft Landing Gear System with Magnetorheological Damper in Various Taxing and Touchdown Scenarios.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This manuscript presents a new approach to describe aircraft landing gear systems equipped with magnetorheological (MR) dampers, integrating a reinforcement learning-based neural network control strategy. The main target of the proposed system is to improve the shock absorber efficiency in the touchdown phase, in addition to reducing the vibration due to rough ground in the taxing phase. The dynamic models of the aircraft landing system in the taxing phase with standard landing ground roughness, one-point touchdown, two-point touchdown, and third-point touchdown are built as the first step. After that, Q-learning-based reinforcement learning is developed. In order to verify the effectiveness of the controller, the co-simulations based on RECURDYN V8R4-MATLAB R2019b of the proposed system and the classical skyhook controller are executed. Based on the simulation results, the proposed controller provides better performance compared to the skyhook controller. The proposed controller provided a maximum improvement of 16% in the touchdown phase and 10% in the taxing phase compared to the skyhook controller.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.