ArticleMicromachines2025
Efficient Particle Capture and Release Method for DNA Library Preparation on Microfluidics.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issues of agglomeration during magnetic particle capture and the incomplete release of these particles during reuse in microfluidic chips for library preparation, a microchamber was utilized to enhance the dispersion area for magnetic particle capture. Additionally, the release of magnetic particles was achieved through the synergistic action of flow field and magnetic field. The simulation results indicated that as the inlet flow velocity varied from 0.02 m/s to 0.16 m/s and the magnet spacing ranged from 1.2 mm to 1.8 mm, the coverage of magnetic particles in the microchamber increased from 17.29% to 63.59%. Meanwhile, the magnetic particle capture rate decreased from 100% to 35.2%. These processes were further validated through experimental methods. During the release process, the trajectory of magnetic particles under the synergistic effect of flow field and magnetic field aligned with expectations. The captured magnetic particles were released from the microchamber within 12 s, achieving a release rate of 100%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.