ArticleMicromachines2025
Application of Generalized Finite Difference Method for Nonlinear Analysis of the Electrothermal Micro-Actuator.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrothermal Actuator Performance Analysis via the Moving Least Square Method.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Experimental and numerical investigations of microthermal actuator employing the amplification theory for achieving competitive performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, the generalized finite difference method (GFDM), a popular meshless numerical method, is employed for predicting the thermal and mechanical behavior of an electrothermal micro-actuator. Based on the concept of GFDM and discretization on the computational domain, the discrete forms of the thermal and mechanical governing equations are derived, respectively. With the help of the incremental load method, the discrete form from the electrothermal analysis is solved precisely and the temperature distribution is obtained. Meanwhile, combining this approach with the discrete control equation derived from the natural boundary condition, its displacement is also evaluated. The convergence of the temperature by different iterative methods is tested and compared. The computational stability and efficiency (CPU time) in these two analyses are also given in this study. To further investigate the accuracy of the solutions, experiments to capture temperature and FEM analysis are conducted. Regardless of the imperfect boundary condition, the temperature distribution calculated by the GFDM shows great agreement with that obtained by experiment and FEM. A similar phenomenon can be also found in the comparison between the displacements evaluated by the GFDM and FEM, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.