ArticleMicromachines2025
Ultrasonic Signal Processing Method for Dynamic Burning Rate Measurement Based on Improved Wavelet Thresholding and Extreme Value Feature Fitting.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasonic measurement techniques are increasingly used to measure the burning rates of solid rocket fuel, but challenges arise due to noise and signal attenuation caused by the motor's multi-layered structure. This paper proposes an adaptive thresholding method combined with a wavelet threshold function for effective ultrasonic signal denoising. Additionally, an extreme value feature fitting algorithm is introduced for accurate echo signal localization, even in low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions. Numerical simulations show a 10 dB improvement in SNR at -20 dB, with a correlation coefficient of 0.83 between the denoised and true signals. Echo localization tests across 12 SNR levels demonstrate a consistent error below 1 μs. Compared to other algorithms, the proposed method achieves higher precision, with a maximum displacement error of 0.74 mm. Hardware-in-the-loop experiments show an increase in SNR from -15 dB to 5.78 dB, with maximum displacement and rate errors of 0.9239 mm and 0.781 mm/s. In fuel-burning experiments, the burning rate curve closely matches the theoretical curve, with an initial fuel thickness error of only 0.12 mm, confirming the method's effectiveness in complex environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.