ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
New Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening and Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Quantification of Longitudinal HRCT Changes During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Progress in the application of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in lung cancer: a review.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lung Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Detection, and Prognosis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Malignancy in Ground-Glass Opacity Using Multivariate Regression and Deep Learning Models: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Early Detection of Lung Cancer: A Review of Innovative Milestones and Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The role of interventional pulmonology in management of pulmonary nodules during lung cancer screening.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Review
- Review
- NSCLC EGFR Mutation Prediction via Random Forest Model: A Clinical-CT-Radiomics Integration Approach.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Recent advances in liquid biopsy for precision oncology: emerging biomarkers and clinical applications in lung cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with 1.8 million deaths annually. Early detection is vital for improving patient outcomes; however, survival rates remain low due to late-stage diagnoses. Accumulating data supports the idea that screening methods are useful for improving early diagnosis in high-risk patients. However, several barriers limit the application of lung cancer screening in real-world settings. The widespread diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI), radiomics, and machine learning has dramatically changed the current diagnostic landscape. This review explores the potential of AI and biomarker-driven methods, particularly liquid biopsy, in enhancing early lung cancer detection. We report the findings of major randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and research on AI algorithms that use multi-modal imaging (e.g., CT and PET scans) and liquid biopsy to identify early molecular alterations. AI algorithms enhance diagnostic accuracy by automating image analysis and reducing inter-reader variability. Biomarker-driven methods identify molecular alterations in patients before imaging signs of cancer are evident. Both AI and liquid biopsy show the potential to improve sensitivity and specificity, enabling the detection of early-stage cancers that traditional methods, like low-dose CT (LDCT) scans, might miss. Integrating AI and biomarker-driven methods offers significant promise for transforming lung cancer screening. These technologies could enable earlier, more accurate detection, ultimately improving survival outcomes. AI-driven lung cancer screening can achieve over 90% sensitivity, compared to 70-80% with traditional methods, and can reduce false positives by up to 30%. AI also boosts specificity to 85-90%, with faster processing times (a few minutes vs. 30-60 min for radiologists). However, challenges remain in standardizing these approaches and integrating them into clinical practice. Ongoing research is essential to fully realize their clinical benefits and enhance timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.