Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40141842›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

New Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening and Artificial Intelligence.

Leonardo Duranti, Luca Tavecchio, Luigi Rolli, Piergiorgio Solli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonardo DurantiThoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Luca TavecchioThoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Luigi RolliThoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Piergiorgio SolliThoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20131 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4890-2578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with 1.8 million deaths annually. Early detection is vital for improving patient outcomes; however, survival rates remain low due to late-stage diagnoses. Accumulating data supports the idea that screening methods are useful for improving early diagnosis in high-risk patients. However, several barriers limit the application of lung cancer screening in real-world settings. The widespread diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI), radiomics, and machine learning has dramatically changed the current diagnostic landscape. This review explores the potential of AI and biomarker-driven methods, particularly liquid biopsy, in enhancing early lung cancer detection. We report the findings of major randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and research on AI algorithms that use multi-modal imaging (e.g., CT and PET scans) and liquid biopsy to identify early molecular alterations. AI algorithms enhance diagnostic accuracy by automating image analysis and reducing inter-reader variability. Biomarker-driven methods identify molecular alterations in patients before imaging signs of cancer are evident. Both AI and liquid biopsy show the potential to improve sensitivity and specificity, enabling the detection of early-stage cancers that traditional methods, like low-dose CT (LDCT) scans, might miss. Integrating AI and biomarker-driven methods offers significant promise for transforming lung cancer screening. These technologies could enable earlier, more accurate detection, ultimately improving survival outcomes. AI-driven lung cancer screening can achieve over 90% sensitivity, compared to 70-80% with traditional methods, and can reduce false positives by up to 30%. AI also boosts specificity to 85-90%, with faster processing times (a few minutes vs. 30-60 min for radiologists). However, challenges remain in standardizing these approaches and integrating them into clinical practice. Ongoing research is essential to fully realize their clinical benefits and enhance timely interventions.

Indexed as

AI in lung cancer screeningartificial intelligenceartificial intelligence in CT imagingartificial intelligence in PET imagingbiomarker-driven screening for lung cancerliquid biopsy in lung cancer detectionlow-dose CT scanlung cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID40141842
PMCPMC11943706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.