Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40141781›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Fusion Deep Learning Model for Predicting Adverse Drug Reactions Based on Multiple Drug Characteristics.

Qing Ou, Xikun Jiang, Zhetong Guo, Jiayi Jiang, Zhanpeng Gan, Fangfang Han, Yongming Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qing OuSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0009-0008-6606-5575
Xikun JiangSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0009-0006-1130-9283
Zhetong GuoSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jiayi JiangSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6618-7596
Zhanpeng GanSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8016-4960
Fangfang HanSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yongming CaiSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted prediction of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has significant potential for improving drug safety and reducing financial costs. Early studies often relied on limited dimensions such as the molecular structure of drugs or interactions with biomolecules. In contrast, integrating these characteristics provides valuable insights into ADR predictions from multiple perspectives, enhancing the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the prediction models. In addition, previous studies have focused on whether a specific adverse drug reaction occurs with a particular drug, ignoring the fact that multiple adverse drug reactions may occur concurrently with a single drug. To address these, we developed a predictor that identifies ADRs early in drug discovery, using a deep learning model designed to fuse multiple drug characteristics. Our approach employed four modules to extract one- and two-dimensional sequence structure information of drug molecules, drug-protein interaction data, and drug similarity. A fusion model integrated these characteristics to predict the precise probability of ADRs. The receiver operating characteristic-area under curve (ROC-AUC), area under precision-recall curve (AUPR), and F1 scores on the benchmark dataset are 0.7002, 0.6619, and 0.6330, respectively. The AUPR is significantly improved compared to the conventional multi-label classifier (from 64.02% to 66.19%). In addition, we compared the results with the state-of-the-art methods on LIU's dataset and the AUPR increased from 34.65% to 68.82%, which shows that our model outperforms them in terms of accuracy and robustness. Ablation experiments further validated the effectiveness of the individual modules. This model accurately predicted the probability of various ADR classes by integrating comprehensive information, thereby offering significant value in enhancing monitoring measures for new drug development and clinical use.

Indexed as

ADRsdrug–drug similaritygraph attention networkgraph convolutional networkmultiple drug characteristicstransformer

Identifiers

PMID40141781
PMCPMC11944162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.