ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Application of the Random Forest Algorithm for Accurate Bipolar Disorder Classification.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid SMOTE and Gaussian mixture model based optimized XGBoost framework for bipolar disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Astragaloside IV Alleviates Osteoarthritis by Upregulating ETS2: A Bioinformatics and Experimental Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Predicting the risk of mental disorders using complete blood count indicators: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond "Fire" and "Ashes": The Influence of Trait Characteristics on the Response to Mood Stabilizers in Bipolar Disorders.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a complex psychiatric condition characterized by alternating episodes of mania and depression, posing significant challenges for accurate and timely diagnosis. This study explores the use of the Random Forest (RF) algorithm as a machine learning approach to classify patients with BD and healthy controls based on electroencephalogram (EEG) data. A total of 330 participants, including euthymic BD patients and healthy controls, were analyzed. EEG recordings were processed to extract key features, including power in frequency bands and complexity metrics such as the Hurst Exponent, which measures the persistence or randomness of a time series, and the Higuchi's Fractal Dimension, which is used to quantify the irregularity of brain signals. The RF model demonstrated robust performance, achieving an average accuracy of 93.41%, with recall and specificity exceeding 93%. These results highlight the algorithm's capacity to handle complex, noisy datasets while identifying key features relevant for classification. Importantly, the model provided interpretable insights into the physiological markers associated with BD, reinforcing the clinical value of EEG as a diagnostic tool. The findings suggest that RF is a reliable and accessible method for supporting the diagnosis of BD, complementing traditional clinical practices. Its ability to reduce diagnostic delays, improve classification accuracy, and optimize resource allocation make it a promising tool for integrating artificial intelligence into psychiatric care. This study represents a significant step toward precision psychiatry, leveraging technology to improve the understanding and management of complex mental health disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.