Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40141669›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Influence of Optimization Algorithms and Computational Complexity on Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.

Patryk Ziolkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patryk ZiolkowskiFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-6702

Funding

Gdańsk University of Technology 037628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper design of concrete mixtures is a critical task in concrete technology, where optimal strength, eco-friendliness, and production efficiency are increasingly demanded. While traditional analytical methods, such as the Three Equations Method, offer foundational approaches to mix design, they often fall short in handling the complexity of modern concrete technology. Machine learning-based models have demonstrated notable efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. This study builds on previous research by investigating not only the impact of computational complexity on the predictive performance of machine learning models but also the influence of different optimization algorithms. The study evaluates the effectiveness of three optimization techniques: the Quasi-Newton Method (QNM), the Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) algorithm, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). A total of forty-five deep neural network models of varying computational complexity were trained and tested using a comprehensive database of concrete mix designs and their corresponding compressive strength test results. The findings reveal a significant interaction between optimization algorithms and model complexity in enhancing prediction accuracy. Models utilizing the QNM algorithm outperformed those using the ADAM and SGD in terms of error reduction (SSE, MSE, RMSE, NSE, and ME) and increased coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

applied machine learningbuildingscementconcreteconcrete mix designconcrete strength predictionconstruction industrydata mininggreen buildinginnovationsustainabilitysustainablesustainable development

Identifiers

PMID40141669
PMCPMC11944114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.