ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Physical and Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortars with Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate: Influence of Grain Size and Composition.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with different grain size after grinding (fine and coarse) was recycled and used as aggregate for non-conventional lightweight cement mortars. The physical and mechanical characteristics were compared to conventional sand-based composites. The workability in the fresh state was evaluated. Accordingly, the composites showed decreases in fluidity with increases in PET percentage weight. Higher thermal insulation and lower mechanical strengths were observed with the increase in plastic dosage due to a density decrease and porosity increase in the composites. Finer grain size PET samples were more resistant (~12-24 MPa) than the coarse-grain samples (~3-23 MPa) due to the higher density and specific surface area of the aggregate. Conversely, higher thermal insulation was obtained with coarse PET addition (~0.6-0.2 W/mK vs. ~0.7-0.35 W/mK). A ductile behavior with discrete cracks after failure was observed after plastic addition to the mixture. Low wettability was observed in PET samples which, although more porous than the sand specimens, showed a hydrophobic behavior which contributed to water repellency. The reported physical, mechanical, thermal, wettability and microstructural features suggest the potential of these composites for both inside and outside applications of non-structural objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.