Measurement Technique Comparison in the Entire Fracture Surface Topography Assessment for Additively Manufactured Materials.

Dawid Zieliński, Aleksandra Mirowska, Przemysław Podulka, Cho-Pei Jiang, Wojciech Macek

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dawid ZielińskiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 11/12 Gabriela Narutowicza, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1953-4064

Aleksandra MirowskaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 11/12 Gabriela Narutowicza, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-3959

Przemysław PodulkaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-3137

Cho-Pei JiangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-7356

Wojciech MacekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 11/12 Gabriela Narutowicza, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-8877

Funding

Gdańsk University of Technology DEC-1/1/2024/IDUB/II.1a/Au+National Taiwan University of Science and Technology 111-2221-E-027 -087 -MY2, 111-2622-E-027 -028, 112-2218-E-A49 -028

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper focuses on comparing the three microscopic measurement techniques, confocal, focus variation, and point for focus, for the evaluation of entire fracture surface topographies. The measurements were performed using a Sensofar S Neox 3D optical profilometer and the Mitutoyo QV Apex 302 vision measuring system. The test specimens required for measuring were printed through laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology using two materials: Stainless Steel 316L and Inconel 718. The printing was performed with a printing power of 200 W, scanning speed of 800 mm/s, and layer thickness of 30 µm or 50 µm. The measurement differences were analyzed on the basis of void volume

Indexed as

entire fracture surfaceLPBF-printed specimensmeasurement techniquessurface metrology

Identifiers

PMID40141638

DOI10.3390/ma18061355

PMCPMC11943968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.