ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Utilization of a PFA-GGBS-Based Precursor in Geopolymer Concrete Production as a Sustainable Substitute for Conventional Concrete.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven evaluation of mechanical and microstructural properties of agro-waste-derived geopolymer concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Valorization of Glass Fiber Waste (VCAS) as a Precursor in Alkali-Activated Systems Cured at Room Temperature-Influence of SiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Geopolymer Chemistry and Composition: A Comprehensive Review of Synthesis, Reaction Mechanisms, and Material Properties-Oriented with Sustainable Construction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of Sulfur-Modified Fly Ash/Metakaolin Geopolymers with Polypropylene Fibers.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awareness of environmental sustainability is driving the shift from conventional Portland cement, a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, to more sustainable alternatives. This study focuses on developing a geopolymer concrete by optimizing geopolymer concrete mixtures with various ratios of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and pulverized fly ash (PFA) as precursors, aiming to find a mix that maximizes strength while minimizing environmental impacts. The precursor was activated using a laboratory-synthesized silica fume (SF)-derived sodium silicate solution in combination with NaOH at a molarity of 10M. This study aims to find the optimal geopolymer concrete mix with a 0.55 water-to-binder ratio, a 0.40 alkali-to-precursor ratio, and a 1:1 sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio. Ordinary Portland cement was used as the control mix binder (C), while the geopolymer mixes included varying GGBS-PFA compositions [CL0 (50% GGBS-50% PFA), CL1 (60% GGBS-40% PFA), CL2 (70% GGBS-30% PFA), CL3 (80% GGBS-20% PFA), and CL4 (90% GGBS-10% PFA)]. The engineering performance of the mixtures was assessed using slump, unconfined compressive strength, split tensile, and flexural strength tests in accordance with their relevant standards. Observations showed that GPC specimens exhibited similar or slightly higher strength values than conventional concrete using PC. In addition to strength, geopolymers have a smaller environmental footprint, consuming less energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These qualities make geopolymer concrete a sustainable construction option that aligns with global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and conserve resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.