ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Study of the Absorption Energy of Auxetic Structures with Non-Newtonian Fluids.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ballistic impact protection has been enhanced through the use of advanced materials, such as shear thickening fluids (STFs) and auxetic structures. These materials provide high energy absorption, flexibility, and comfort, offering promising solutions for the development of lightweight and effective personal protective equipment. The combination of STFs and auxetic structures has been shown to optimize impact resistance while maintaining mobility. To validate this, a composite made of an auxetic structure impregnated with a polyurethane and STF mixture was evaluated for energy absorption. The auxetic structure, fabricated using high-tenacity polyester, demonstrated superior energy absorption compared to standard foams. The impregnation of the auxetic structure with 200 and 400 wt% Biresin and STF mixtures significantly enhanced its impact energy absorption capacity up to 76% compared to the auxetic reference. With the addition of the STF at a 25:75 ratio into the biresin matrix, improvements were also verified in the absorption, up to 7%, due to the non-Newtonian behavior of the STF, demonstrating the potential of these composites for low-impact applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.