ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Recent Research Progress in the Abrasive Machining and Finishing of Additively Manufactured Metal Parts.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on the Polishing Mechanism of Composite Magnetic Field-Controlled Internal Flow Channels in Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Additively Manufactured Porous Structures of Nickel-Based Superalloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of Surface Morphology and Topography of Additively Manufactured SS 316L Steel After AWJM in Dependence on Layer Orientation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the production of complex geometrical parts with metals; however, the usual layer-by-layer deposition results in poor surface quality and unpredictable surface integrity. Abrasive machining and finishing techniques play vital roles in counteracting these challenges and qualifying AM parts for practical applications. This review aims to present recent research developments concerning the machining of additively manufactured metal parts via both conventional and nonconventional abrasive machining methods. Conventional methods such as grinding, milling, polishing, honing, and sandblasting have been widely investigated for their ability to enhance the surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and mechanical properties of AM metal components. However, the characteristic features of various AM processes, such as porosity, microstructural features, and residual stresses, can significantly influence the machinability of the produced parts. Nonconventional methods such as abrasive flow machining, electrochemical machining, magnetic abrasive finishing, and vibratory bowl finishing, on the other hand, have shown potential in addressing the difficulties associated with internal machining geometries and hard-to-machine material combinations that are typical for many AM parts. This review also highlights some challenges and future trends in the machining of AM metal parts and emphasizes that further research is required in the direction of combinations of various postprocessing techniques, machinability regarding new alloy compositions, and the integration of AI for process optimization. As the demand for high-precision AM parts grows across various industries, the advancement of abrasive machining and finishing techniques is crucial for driving the wider adoption of AM technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.