ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Optimization and Standardization of Plant-Derived Vascular Scaffolds.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growing Relevance of Decellularized Plant Material as Functional Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Cultured Meat: A Scoping Review on Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Implantation of Bioreactor-Conditioned Plant-Based Vascular Grafts.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Decellularized porcine vascular grafts: structural integrity and translational potential for allogeneic implantation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Engineering vascular grafts from decellularized plants: Advances and challenges.Histology and histopathology · 2025Review
- Improving the Biocompatibility of Plant-Derived Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Using Heat Treatment.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Plant-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Review.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular graft failure rates remain unacceptably high due to thrombosis and poor integration, necessitating innovative solutions. This study optimized plant-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds as a scalable and biocompatible alternative to synthetic grafts and autologous vessels. We refined decellularization protocols to achieve >95% DNA removal while preserving mechanical properties comparable to native vessels, significantly enhancing endothelial cell seeding. Leatherleaf viburnum leaves were decellularized using sodium dodecyl sulfate-based and Trypsin/Tergitol-based treatments, achieved via clearing in bleach and Triton X-100 for 6 to 72 h. To assess the environmental influence on scaffold performance, leaves from multiple collection sites were processed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-based protocols. Scaffold performance was evaluated through tensile testing and histological analysis to assess structural integrity, while DNA quantification and endothelial cell recellularization measured biological compatibility. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-treated scaffolds with shorter clearing durations demonstrated the highest DNA removal (≥95%) while preserving mechanical properties, significantly outperforming Trypsin/Tergitol treatments. Longer clearing times reduced fiber diameter by 60%, compromising scaffold strength. Shorter clearing times preserved extracellular matrix integrity and significantly improved endothelial cell seeding efficiency. Larger leaves supported significantly higher endothelial cell densities than smaller leaves, highlighting the need for standardized material sources. Permeability tests demonstrated minimal leakage at 120 mmHg and structural stability under dynamic flow conditions, suggesting their suitability for vascular applications. These findings establish a reliable framework for optimizing plant-derived grafts, improving their reproducibility and performance for tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.