Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40141388›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Can the Supplementation of Oocytes with Extra Copies of mtDNA Impact Development Without Being Transmitted? A Molecular Account.

Justin C St John, Eryk Andreas, Alexander Penn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin C St JohnExperimental Mitochondrial Genetics Group, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-1449
Eryk AndreasExperimental Mitochondrial Genetics Group, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8971-2343
Alexander PennExperimental Mitochondrial Genetics Group, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3011-4397

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1136065National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1160106National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2000723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of extra copies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), whether autologous or heterologous, into oocytes at the time of fertilisation or through other assisted reproductive technologies, such as nuclear transfer, is a contentious issue. The primary focus has been on whether third-party mtDNA is transmitted to the offspring and if it impacts offspring health and well-being. However, little attention has focused on whether the introduction of extra copies of mtDNA will interfere with the balance established between the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes during oogenesis and as the developing embryo establishes its own epigenetic imprint that will influence mature offspring. Whilst we determined that sexually mature offspring generated through mtDNA supplementation did not inherit any-third party mtDNA, they exhibited differences in gene expression from three tissues derived from three separate embryonic lineages. This resulted in a number of pathways being affected. In each case, the differences were greater in the heterologous and autologous comparison than when comparing all supplemented offspring against non-supplemented offspring. Many of the changes in gene expression were coupled to differential DNA methylation across tissues, some of which were tissue-specific, with high levels observed in the heterologous against autologous comparison. An analysis of DNA methylation in blastocyst-stage embryos pointed to changes in patterns of DNA methylation that were transmitted through to the offspring. Our results indicated that extra copies of mtDNA may not be transmitted if introduced at low levels, but the changes induced by supplementation that occur in DNA methylation and gene expression in the blastocyst have a profound effect on tissues.

Indexed as

DNA, MitochondrialEmbryonic DevelopmentOocytesAnimalsBlastocystDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceOogenesisDNA, MitochondrialDNA methylationgene expressionmtDNAoffspringoocytesegregationsupplementationtransmission

Identifiers

PMID40141388
PMCPMC11943178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.