ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
A Comparative Genomic Analysis of Epstein-Barr Virus Strains with a Focus on EBV2 Variability.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most genomic studies on Epstein-Barr virus variability have focused on the geographic and pathological associations of EBV1 genomes. In contrast, the variability of EBV2 genomes has been less explored, mainly due to their restricted geographic circulation and the lesser number of sequenced EBV2 isolates. In this study, we sequenced and analyzed twenty-eight EBV1 and ten EBV2 genomes and a potential recombinant from Argentina, which were combined with two-hundred-and-thirty-nine downloaded complete genomes from other geographic regions, to produce an initial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.