Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40141304›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Genomic Prediction for Germplasm Improvement Through Inter-Heterotic-Group Line Crossing in Maize.

Dehe Cheng, Jinlong Li, Shuwei Guo, Yuandong Wang, Shizhong Xu, Shaojiang Chen, Wenxin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dehe ChengState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Jinlong LiState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Shuwei GuoState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yuandong WangMaize Research Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Shizhong XuDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Shaojiang ChenState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Wenxin LiuState Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-Breeding, National Maize Improvement Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-1244

Funding

the Key Research and Development Program of the Seed Industry Innovation of Yangling Ylzy-ym-05the Key Research and Development project of Ordos YF20240016the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1200802the Science and Technology Innovation Team of Maize Modern Seed Industry in Hebei 21326319D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germplasm improvement is essential for maize breeding. Currently, intra-heterotic-group crossing is the major method for germplasm improvement, while inter-heterotic-group crossing is also used in breeding but not in a systematic way. In this study, five inbred lines from four heterotic groups were used to develop a connected segregating population through inter-heterotic-group line crossing (CSPIC), which comprised 5 subpopulations with 535 doubled haploid (DH) lines and 15 related test-cross populations including 1568 hybrids. Significant genetic variation was observed in most subpopulations, with several DH populations exhibiting superior phenotypes regarding traits such as plant height (PH), ear height (EH), days to anthesis (DTA), and days to silking (DTS). Notably, 10.8% of hybrids in the population POP5/C229 surpassed the high-yielding hybrid ND678 (CK). To reduce field planting costs and quickly screen for the best inter-heterotic-group DH lines and test-cross hybrids, we assessed the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) for within- and between-population predictions in the DH populations and the test-cross populations. Within the DH or the hybrid population, the prediction accuracy varied across populations and traits, with an average hybrid yield prediction accuracy of 0.41, reaching 0.54 in POP5/Z58. In the cross DH population predictions, the prediction accuracy of the half-sib population exceeded that of the non-sib cross population prediction, with the highest accuracy observed when the non-shared parents were from the same heterotic group, and the average phenotypic prediction accuracies of POP3 predicting POP2 and POP2 predicting POP3 were 0.54 and 0.45, respectively. In the cross hybrid population predictions, the accuracy was highest when both the training and the test sets came from the same DH populations, with an average accuracy of 0.43. The proportion of shared polymorphisms with respect to SNPs between the training and the test sets (PSP) exhibited a significant and strong correlation with the prediction accuracy of cross population prediction. This study demonstrates the feasibility of creating new heterotic groups through inter-heterotic-group crossing in germplasm improvement, and some cross population prediction patterns exhibited excellent prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsPlant BreedingZea maysCrosses, GeneticGenetic VariationHaploidyHybridization, GeneticPhenotypeQuantitative Trait Locigenomic selectiongermplasm improvementinter-heterotic-groupmaize

Identifiers

PMID40141304
PMCPMC11942448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.