Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40141071›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Opportunities for Discovery Using Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Melanoma.

Uma Nair, Emily Rakestraw, Georgia M Beasley, Margaret H O'Connor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Uma NairDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Emily RakestrawDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-9356-5704
Georgia M BeasleyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-9030
Margaret H O'ConnorDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of resectable advanced-stage melanoma with neoadjuvant immunotherapy is rapidly becoming the new standard of care due to significant improvements in event-free survival (EFS) compared to surgery first followed by immunotherapy. The level of responsiveness seen in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) must be mechanistically understood not only for the standardization of treatment but also to advance the novel concept of personalized cancer immunotherapy. This review aims to elucidate markers of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and blood that can predict treatment outcome. Interestingly, the canonical proteins involved in the molecular interactions that immunotherapies aim to disrupt have not been consistent indicators of treatment response, which amplifies the necessity for further research on the predictive model. Other major discussions surrounding neoadjuvant therapy involve the higher-level investigation of ICI efficacy due to the ability to examine a post-treatment tumor molecularly and pathologically, which this review will also cover. As neoadjuvant ICI becomes the standard of care in advanced melanoma treatment, further research aiming to identify more predictive biomarkers of treatment response to advance medical decision-making and patient care should continue to be sought after.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaNeoadjuvant TherapyBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsimmunotherapylymph nodesmelanomaneoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID40141071
PMCPMC11942238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.