ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Assessing the quality of care for knee osteoarthritis in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and healthcare professional perceptions of weight reduction in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic literature review.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Review
- Who is waiting to see the surgeon? sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and previous osteoarthritis care of people with knee osteoarthritis referred to public hospitals in Victoria, Australia.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Understanding the treatment journey and experiences of knee osteoarthritis patients receiving standard care in Singapore: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Reliability of the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator Questionnaire for Assessing Osteoarthritis Care in Bilingual General Practices in South Tyrol/Alto Adige, Italy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to assess the self-reported quality of care for people with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore and to investigate the associations between participant characteristics and functional outcomes at 1 year in relation to the reported quality of care.
methodsPatients with knee osteoarthritis completed the osteoarthritis quality indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire, a validated patient-reported measure that assesses the clinician's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for non-surgical knee osteoarthritis education and patient education. The OA-QI includes 17 indicators, with "achievement" defined as a 'Yes' response for each. We calculated individual per-item, overall per-item mean, and per-person achievement rates (%) and examined associations between participant characteristics, achievement rates, and function at 1 year.
resultsA total of 314 participants completed the OA-QI. Referral for physical activity (87.5%) and referral for daily activity aid assessment (15.7%) had the highest and lowest per-item achievement rates, respectively. The overall mean per-item and per-person achievement rates were both 62.2%. Participants educated about steroid injections (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 7.23 [1.42-13.04]; p = 0.015) or surgery (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 12.65 [5.89-19.40]; p < 0.001) had worse functional outcomes at one year than those who were eligible but not informed. Those not assessed for walking aids and indicating walking issues had poorer outcomes one year later (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: -9.89 (-19.63, -0.15); p = 0.0470). However, no significant associations were found between per-person achievement rates and 1-year functional outcomes.
conclusionsThe quality of care in Singapore for people with knee osteoarthritis is suboptimal, especially for those needing walking aids and weight loss assistance. However, the quality of care alone does not fully account for long-term outcomes, suggesting that other factors need to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.