Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140995›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2025

Development and validation of inpatient mortality prediction models for patients with hyperglycemic crisis using machine learning approaches.

Rui He, Kebiao Zhang, Hong Li, Manping Gu

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui HeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Kebiao Zhang *Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. zhangkebiao0537@163.com.
Hong LiDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Manping Gu *Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. gumanping@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperglycemic crisis is one of the most common and severe complications of diabetes mellitus, associated with a high motarlity rate. Emergency admissions due to hyperglycemic crisis remain prevalent and challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for in-hospital mortality risk among patients with hyperglycemic crisis admitted to the emergency department using various machine learning (ML) methods.

methodsA multi-center retrospective study was conducted across six large general adult hospitals in Chongqing, western China. Patients diagnosed with hyperglycemic crisis were identified using an electronic medical record (EMR) database. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, complications, and therapeutic interventions were extracted from the medical records to construct the prognostic prediction model. Seven machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), recursive partitioning and regression trees (RPART), extreme gradient boosting with dart booster (XGBoost), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), neural network (NNET), and adaptive boost (AdaBoost) were compared with logistic regression (LR) for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with hyperglycemic crisis. Stratified random sampling was used to split the data into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Ten-fold cross validation was performed on the training set to optimize model hyperparameters. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy of all models were computed for comparative analysis.

resultsA total of 1668 patients were eligible for the present study. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.3% (121/1668). In the training set, feature importance scores were calculated for each of the eight models, and the top 10 significant features were identified. In the validation set, all models demonstrated good predictive capability, with areas under the curve value exceeding 0.9 with a F1 score between 0.632 and 0.81, except the MARS model. Six machine learning algorithm models outperformed the referred logistic regression algorithm except the MARS model. Among the selected models, RPART, RF, and SVM achieved the best performance in the selected models (AUC values were 0.970, 0.968 and 0.968, F1 score were 0.652, 0.762, 0.762 respectively). Feature importance analysis identified novel predictors including mechanical ventilation, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, blood gas index, first 24-hour insulin dosage, and first 24-hour fluid intake.

conclusionMost machine learning algorithms exhibited excellent performance predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with hyperglycemic crisis except the MARS model, and the best one was RPART model. These algorithms identified overlapping but different, up to 10 predictors. Early identification of high-risk patients using these models could support clinical decision-making and potentially improve the prognosis of hyperglycemic crisis patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityHyperglycemiaInpatientsMachine LearningAdultAgedChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesEmergencyHyperglycemic crisisMachine learningMortality

Identifiers

PMID40140995
PMCPMC11948940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.