SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Independent risk factors for placental abruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gestational-Age Clustering of Recurrent Placental Abruption: A Multicenter Retrospective Descriptive Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association between small-for-gestational-age at birth and placental abruption in normotensive pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Independent Risk Factors for Placental Abruption in Preeclampsia and a Preliminary Prediction Model: A Retrospective Study with Internal Validation.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Rapid Response System Activations in Obstetric Patients: A Multicenter Registry-Based Study in Japan.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Unveiling the risks and outcomes of preeclampsia: a case-control study in the UAE.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Polyhydramnios at Term in Gestational Diabetes: Should We Be Concerned?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of clinical risk factors of premature infants in Chinese women based on anemia status.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Successful conservative management with uterine preservation in an adolescent with Couvelaire uterus and incomplete HELLP syndrome: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlacental abruption is one of the most severe complications during pregnancy, and its associated risk factors remain incompletely understood and somewhat controversial.
methodsThis study conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to collect literature related to placental abruption, with a cutoff date of July 30, 2024.
resultsA total of 54 observational studies were included, covering 7,267,241 pregnant women, with 47,702 cases diagnosed with placental abruption. The study identified three categories of independent risk factors: The first category includes baseline maternal characteristics (18 items), such as maternal age ≥ 35 years, black race, low prepregnancy BMI (< 18.5 kg/m²), unmarried status, smoking during pregnancy, alcohol consumption, inadequate prenatal care (< 4 visits), marijuana use, multiple pregnancy, parity ≥ 3, anemia (hemoglobin < 11 g/dL), previous placental abruption, previous cesarean section, previous miscarriage, previous stillbirth, cervical incompetence, habitual abortions, and assisted reproductive technology. Among these, previous placental abruption (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI [2.16, 3.42]) was found to be the most significant risk factor. The second category includes pregnancy-related complications (7 items), such as preterm premature rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, small for gestational age, polyhydramnios, antepartum hemorrhage, gestational hypertension, and placenta previa. Of these, placenta previa (AOR = 7.31, 95% CI [4.78, 11.19]) was identified as the most significant risk factor. The third category consists of other independent risk factors (33 items) and protective factors (3 items). However, methodological inconsistencies and publication bias in the current studies may affect the reliability of the meta-analysis results.
conclusionThis study summarizes 58 independent risk factors for placental abruption, covering various aspects such as maternal baseline characteristics and pregnancy complications. For these high-risk populations, it is essential to strengthen the frequency of prenatal check-ups, establish early warning systems, and provide targeted health guidance. Future research should further refine risk factor models and develop more targeted preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of placental abruption and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. PROSPERO: CRD42024546514. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.